Categorii
Corporate

NEWS: Cristina Popa-Bochiş articol pentru BUSINESS MAGAZIN

7 trenduri în recrutarea leadershipului pentru 2026

Piața de executive search s-a schimbat structural în ultimii ani. Presiunea pe profitabilitate, guvernanța strictă și așteptările ridicate ale investitorilor au redus drastic toleranța pentru erori de leadership. Astăzi, fiecare numire executivă este analizată prin prisma riscului strategic, iar recrutarea a devenit un exercițiu de anticipare, nu doar de selecție.

Cu peste 20 de ani de experiență în executive search, Cristina Popa-Bochiș, Partener & Senior Consultant PFP Advisory, a identificat cele șapte tendințe care definesc recrutarea la vârful organizațiilor în 2026:

1. Leadership fracțional și interim în creștere.

2. Competențe reale în locul titlurilor academice.

3. Inteligența artificială în criteriile de selecție.

4. Verificări de background mai riguroase.

5. Internal first – evaluare comparativă internă vs. externă.

6. Pachete de remunerare mai sofisticat și mai legate de performanță.

7. Integrarea post-numire, parte din procesul de recrutare.

Nu mai recrutăm cel mai potrivit candidat pentru un rol stabil, ci recrutăm pentru momente strategice. În 2026, avantajul competitiv începe și se pierde la nivel de leadership.

 

Citește tot articolul aici: https://www.businessmagazin.ro/opinii/cristina-popa-bochis-partener-senior-consultant-in-cadrul-pfp-23080337

Categorii
Corporate

NEWS: Alexandra Ene articol pentru Republica.ro

Ce fac diferit liderii care performează: 10 observații din Executive Search

Diferența dintre un lider care crește o organizație și unul care o ține pe loc nu stă în CV sau diplome, ci în comportamente recurente. După sute de interviuri și procese de executive search locale și internaționale, Alexandra Ene, Managing Partner PFP Advisory, a identificat cele 10 lucruri pe care liderii cu adevărat performanți le fac diferit.

1. Știu ce nu știu.

2. Iau decizii cu informații incomplete.

3. Angajează oameni care îi pot contrazice.

4. Separă urgentul de important.

5. Tratează plecările din echipă ca pe informație, nu ca pe eșec.

6. Nu confundă loialitatea cu performanța.

7. Își protejează energia pentru deciziile care contează.

8. Au trecut printr-un eșec major și l-au procesat.

9. Nu recrutează când le e foame.

10. Știu să citească o încăpere.

Aceste comportamente nu se predau în niciun MBA. Se formează prin experiență, decizii asumate și eșecuri procesate onest. Liderii care le au sunt puțini și exact de aceea fac diferența.

 

Citește articol complet pe website-ul Republica.ro: https://republica.ro/am-intervievat-sute-de-lideri-ce-fac-diferit-cei-care-performeaza

Categorii
Corporate

POV: Adecvarea leadershipului și momentul deciziilor dificile

Uneori, problema în companie nu este strategia. Ci persoana care trebuie să o execute.

Spun asta cu prudență, pentru că schimbarea unui lider nu e niciodată o decizie ușoară. Dar în munca mea de executive search am văzut de mai multe ori organizații care încercau să „repare” rezultate prin ajustări de plan, bugete sau structură… când, de fapt, blocajul era la nivel de leadership.

Câteva semne pe care le-am observat în timp:
– Creșterea stagnează de 2–3 ani, deși piața oferă oportunități. Nu e declin, dar nici progres sau energie de accelerare, doar o zonă de confort prelungită.
– Turnover ridicat în middle management. Oamenii buni pleacă nu neapărat din cauza companiei, ci din cauza direcției sau lipsei de claritate.
– Board-ul vorbește despre transformare, inovație, curaj. Organizația răspunde cu prudență excesivă, amânări, multe motive pentru care „nu e momentul”.
– CEO-ul este permanent în operațional. Stinge incendii, intră în detalii, decide lucruri care ar trebui să fie delegate, iar strategia rămâne pe slide-uri.

Diferența importantă este că un lider potrivit pentru stabilitate nu este automat potrivit pentru scalare sau transformare. Iar când lucrurile nu merg, nu spun că soluția este întotdeauna „schimbăm liderul”. Uneori se poate încerca redefinirea rolului, sprijin extern, coaching sau reașezarea echipei. Alteori însă, organizația a crescut mai repede decât liderul ei.

Adecvarea leadershipului nu este o etichetă permanentă, ci este contextuală. Prin urmare, una dintre cele mai mature întrebări pe care un board sau un antreprenor și le poate pune este: „ Este acest lider potrivit pentru direcția în care vrem să ducem compania?”

Articol scris de Alexandra Ene, Managing Partner & Senior Consultant PFP Advisory pentru LinkedIn.

 

Ai nevoie de sprijin pentru recrutarea următorului lider în organizația ta? Te putem ajuta: https://pfpadvisory.com/contact/

Categorii
Corporate

NEWS: PFP Advisory featured in Revista CARIERE

We are pleased to share that Revista CARIERE recently featured the announcement of Cristina Popa-Bochiș joining PFP Advisory as Partner.

While this step was officially announced at the beggining of 2026, the partnership already reflects in the way we approach executive search and leadership advisory mandates – with deeper industry insight and an even more strategic lens on leadership impact.

Cristina brings extensive executive search experience and a nuanced understanding of organizational dynamics, strengthening our capability to support boards, entrepreneurs, and senior executives in critical leadership decisions.

We thank Revista CARIERE for covering this important milestone.

You can read the full article here: https://www.revistacariere.ro/leadership/on-the-move/piata-de-executive-search-cristina-popa-bochis-devine-partener-in-cadrul-pfp-advisory

Categorii
Corporate

Why Executive Search fails and how to get it right

Executive search is not just recruitment at a higher level

Executive search is often perceived as a premium version of recruitment. In reality, it is a fundamentally different process. When executive search fails, it is rarely because of a lack of candidates in the market, it fails because the process is misunderstood, rushed, or poorly executed.

Senior leadership hires carry strategic, cultural, and financial consequences. A failed search can delay growth, damage internal trust, and cost significantly more than anticipated.

Below are the most common reasons executive search fails and what companies can do differently to get it right.

1. The role is not clearly defined

One of the most frequent causes of failure is an unclear or unrealistic role definition. Companies often start a search with a job title, not a success profile.

Common issues include:

  • Misalignment between stakeholders on expectations

  • Overloaded roles combining multiple senior responsibilities

  • Confusion between operational delivery and strategic leadership

Without clarity on what success looks like in 12–24 months, even strong candidates may fail.

How to get it right: A successful executive search process starts with deep discovery: business context, strategy, leadership gaps, and cultural dynamics, not just a job description.

2. The search relies too heavily on CVs and past titles

Senior candidates are often evaluated primarily on experience, brand names, or previous job titles. While relevant experience matters, it is not a reliable predictor of future performance.

Executive roles require:

  • Decision-making under pressure

  • Leadership adaptability

  • Cultural and values alignment

A strong CV does not guarantee effectiveness in a new environment.

How to get it right: Use structured interviews and leadership assessments to evaluate how candidates think, lead, and perform, not just where they have worked.

3. The process is rushed due to business pressure

Leadership vacancies create urgency. However, compressing the executive search process often leads to compromises that are costly in the long term.

Rushed searches typically result in:

  • Limited market mapping

  • Over-reliance on “available” candidates

  • Insufficient assessment and referencing

Speed replaces rigor and risk increases.

How to get it right: A disciplined timeline with clear milestones ensures both efficiency and quality. Executive search should move with focus, not haste.

4. Confidentiality is not properly managed

Executive candidates are often employed, visible, and cautious. A lack of discretion can damage both the candidate’s reputation and the client’s employer brand.

Poor confidentiality leads to:

  • Candidate withdrawals

  • Market noise

  • Reduced access to top passive talent

How to get it right: A professional executive search process prioritizes discretion, controlled outreach, and transparent communication with all parties involved.

5. Cultural fit is underestimated

Many leadership hires fail not because of competence, but because of cultural misalignment. Culture influences decision-making, collaboration, and leadership acceptance.

Ignoring culture results in:

  • Internal resistance

  • Low engagement

  • Early exits despite strong performance

How to get it right: Assess values, leadership style, and behavioral drivers alongside technical competence. Cultural alignment should be evaluated intentionally, not assumed.

6. There is no post-placement follow-up

Executive search does not end with an accepted offer. The first months are critical for integration, credibility, and performance.

Without follow-up:

  • Early warning signs are missed

  • Misalignment escalates silently

  • Retention risk increases

How to get it right: Post-placement check-ins support both the executive and the organization, increasing long-term success and stability.

Getting executive search right

A successful executive search is structured, insight-driven, and human-centered. It balances market knowledge with rigorous assessment and close collaboration between client and consultant.

Organizations that get executive search right:

  • Hire leaders who perform, not just impress

  • Reduce long-term hiring risk

  • Build stronger leadership teams

Executive search fails when it is treated as a transaction. It succeeds when it is treated as a strategic partnership.

If your organization is preparing for a critical leadership hire, investing in the right process from the beginning can make the difference between short-term relief and long-term impact.

Considering an executive or senior leadership hire?
A confidential discussion with an experienced consultant can help clarify your approach and reduce hiring risk.

Contact us: https://pfpadvisory.com/contact/ 

Categorii
Corporate

Cristina Popa-Bochis joins PFP Advisory as Partner

We are getting the year started with a special announcement: Cristina Popa-Bochis is joining PFP Advisory as Partner.

With over 20 years of experience, she is one of the most experienced Executive Search consultants in the Industrial sector in Romania. A CIPD graduate and Hogan certified professional, she brings deep expertise across Industrial & Manufacturing, Automotive, Renewables, and related sectors, having successfully managed executive and senior-level searches for both operational and support functions across the CEE region.

Beyond her impressive professional background, this partnership is especially meaningful as Cristina and Alexandra Ene, the founder of PFP Advisory, have worked together before, building a relationship grounded in mutual respect, trust, and shared values. We are genuinely excited to be collaborating again and to combine our experience for the benefit of our clients and candidates.

Together, we will continue to deliver exceptional executive search, recruitment, and assessment services, supporting organizations with impactful talent solutions.

Categorii
Corporate

POV: Când candidații spun “nu”

Coșmarul Consultantului de executive search: totul merge bine în procesul de recrutare, candidatul pare foarte potrivit și entuziasmat, și dintr-o dată… se retrage.

În spatele fiecărui “nu” există însă o poveste. Uneori primesc o ofertă mai bună, de la altă companie sau angajatorul curent. Alteori, procesul e prea lung sau prea complex, comunicarea e greoaie, sau apare un red flag pe parcursul interviurilor.

Greșelile sau confuziile în procesul de recrutare pot descuraja candidații sau pot duce la decalaje semnificative. De exemplu, întârzieri în programarea interviurilor, întrebări nepotrivite sau lipsa clarității despre rol sau pașii următori.

Candidații se pot răzgândi și pentru că au dat curs unor discuții dar de fapt nu vor să schimbe jobul sau își dau seama că nu rezonează cu compania / echipa cu care sunt în proces de recrutare. Alții renunță după ce primesc feedback negativ despre companie de la foști sau actuali angajați sau citesc recenzii negative online și nu vor să riște.

Dar de cele mai multe ori, motivul real este lipsa unei conexiuni autentice între candidat și companie. Recrutarea nu e doar evaluare, e și relație. Și dacă relația nu e bine construită, dacă nu se acordă importanță și acestui aspect, oricât de bună ar fi oferta, candidatul va fi pe muchie și lucrurile se pot strica în orice moment.

Cum poți evita pierderea candidaților valoroși
  • Simplifică procesul de selecție și oferă un calendar clar al etapelor.

  • Comunică transparent, chiar și atunci când nu ai vești imediate.

  • Oferă feedback constructiv și prompt.

  • Pune accent pe experiența candidatului, nu doar pe evaluare.

  • Fii atent la ton, empatie și respect în fiecare interacțiune.

Dacă vrei să optimizezi procesele de recrutare și să construiești o experiență de candidat pozitivă, bazată pe încredere și autenticitate: https://pfpadvisory.com/contact/

 

Acest articol a apărut prima dată pe LinkedIn , scris de Alexandra Ene

Categorii
Corporate

Balancing experience and potential in management recruitment

Decoding Talent Acquisition: Balancing experience and potential when recruiting a manager is a nuanced process that depends on the specific needs and goals of your organization. Here’s a breakdown of both perspectives:

Experience:
  • Proven Track Record: Experienced managers have background in handling various challenges, making them equipped to manage different situations more effectively. Encountering and resolving various issues in past roles equips senior candidates with problem-solving skills that can be applied to new situations. This can save time and resources when dealing with complex issues.
  • Immediate Impact: They often require less training and can contribute to the organization’s goals more quickly due to their familiarity with similar roles. They can often hit the ground running, being a what we call a “plug & play” profile.
  • Risk Reduction: Their experience can mean high-quality work and more appropriate decisions, reducing the potential for costly mistakes and allowing them to provide guidance to their team based on past experiences.
  • Reduced Learning Curve: Learning curves are inherent to any new role. However, experienced candidates often have a shorter learning curve, allowing them to adapt to new processes and technologies more swiftly.
  • Mentorship Potential: Experienced employees can serve as mentors to less experienced team members. They can provide guidance, share insights, and contribute to the growth and development of the team, facilitating knowledge transfer within the organization. Furthermore, having experienced mentors can help retain top talent, as employees value opportunities for growth and learning. When new hires see that the organization invests in their development by providing access to experienced mentors, they’re more likely to feel engaged and motivated to contribute effectively.
  • Client and Stakeholder Relations: In roles that involve interacting with clients and stakeholders, experienced candidates are more likely to have established relationships and a better understanding of client needs.
  • Leadership and Decision-Making: In managerial roles, experience often leads to better decision-making and effective leadership. Experienced managers can draw on past experiences to guide their teams and drive results.
  • Crisis Management: When unexpected challenges arise, experienced professionals tend to remain calm and composed, drawing from their past experiences to manage crises effectively.
  • Industry Insights: Experienced candidates bring insights about industry trends, competition, and market dynamics that can be invaluable in shaping business strategies.
  • Confidence and Poise: Another advantage of recruiting a person with experience is the confidence and poise they bring to their role. Seniority often equips individuals with a sense of assurance in their abilities. Having faced and overcome various challenges in their career, experienced professionals tend to approach new tasks and responsibilities with a level of self-assuredness. This confidence can have a positive impact on their performance, decision-making, and interactions with colleagues, clients, and stakeholders.

However, past performance does no guarantee future performance, which is why high potential candidates should still be in the run.

Potential:
  • Fresh Perspectives: Individuals with less experience, unburdened by preconceived notions, often bring to the table creative thinking, original viewpoints and innovative ideas that can challenge the status quo. This encourages a culture of continuous improvement and fosters a mindset of innovation which can drive the organization to explore new opportunities.
  • Adaptability: Potential-driven managers tend to be more open to learning and adapting to changing contexts, which is essential in today’s rapidly evolving business landscape. Their proactive approach to evolving circumstances can lead to the organization remaining responsive and resilient.
  • Long-Term Investment: By identifying and nurturing high-potential individuals, organizations make a strategic investment in their future top leadership pipeline. These candidates possess qualities that can be developed over time, aligning with the organization’s growth trajectory and long-term vision.
  • Eagerness to Learn: High-potential candidates are typically eager to learn and take on new challenges. Their curiosity can lead to continuous improvement and a culture of ongoing development.
  • Energy and Enthusiasm: Their enthusiasm and passion can be contagious, boosting team morale and motivation, and fostering a positive work environment. Thus, they could have an impact on team spirit, elevating engagement levels, and cultivating an atmosphere where challenges are seen as exciting opportunities to excel.
  • Resilience: High-potential candidates often exhibit a high level of determination and resilience, enabling them to bounce back from setbacks and persevere in the face of challenges.
  • Diverse Skill Sets: These candidates may come from various backgrounds, bringing miscellaneous skill sets that can complement and enrich the existing team’s capabilities. Their distinctive capabilitities could bring fresh dimensions to problem-solving and decision-making, driving well-rounded outcomes.
  • Leadership Potential: Even if they’re not stepping into a top role immediately, high-potential candidates often display leadership qualities that can be nurtured and developed over time.
  • Cultural Fit: Being relatively new to the organization, these candidates are more likely to embrace and embody the company’s culture, making integration smoother.
  • Retention and Engagement: Organizations that invest in high-potential individuals demonstrate a commitment to employee growth and development, which can lead to increased job satisfaction, engagement, and retention.
Finding the Balance:
  • Context Matters: Consider the specific role, team, and company goals. For critical positions requiring immediate results, experience might be prioritized. For roles with room for growth and innovation, potential could be more valuable.
  • Hybrid Approach: Look for candidates who offer a blend of both. Someone with a strong foundation of experience combined with a demonstrated hunger to learn and grow can be a valuable asset.
  • Assessment Tools: Utilize assessment tools, psychometric tests, competency-based interviews, simulations, and scenario-based assessments to gauge a candidate’s ability to handle real-world situations, regardless of experience.
  • Investment in Development: If you lean towards potential, ensure you have a solid plan for mentoring, training, and guiding the manager to meet your organization’s expectations.

 

In essence, the best approach is to prioritize what aligns with your organization’s immediate and long-term needs. Remember that each recruitment scenario is unique. Therefore, carefully evaluating candidates based on your organization’s circumstances and culture will yield the best outcome.